about copyright and theft. Everyone who publishes a Russian-speaking Internet or another text, especially having any commercial value, sooner or later confronted with the fact that respectable audience either did not know or did not want to know about what the meaning of the legislation puts the concept of copyright
.
immediately say, that this post is not addressed to those who responds to it:
but I do not care if I break the law .
it is directed only to those who want to follow the rules of decency, does not intend to steal and does not intend to violate that very law.
But for some reason can not understand what a copyright, although any information on this subject is very easy to find all in the same network.
Imagine yourself, honorable ladies and gentlemen, place a simple working of the author.
you possibly try to do something to the public for free, give free a lot of small and even smaller consultations are trying to post the information in free access, without asking anything in return.
you have a weakness to think that given society is not only a tithe of their labor and knowledge, but even much more.
A society does not think so, Venerable ladies and gentlemen.
Society does not want to know that you also need a piece of bread.
He does not care what it costs to keep a small business in your country how hard you work and as three o'clock in the night drop nose into the keyboard from exhaustion, having added another text.
Society wants you to do all
did free.
you write text to advertise your business and bring readers to your site, posting it to the network, having supplied abundant warnings that the text is protected by copyright, which can not take it - and a month later find it on another site, reprinted as a whole.
The first time you patiently explain the copy that he had violated the law. In the fiftieth
you simmer internally but continues to remain polite. In the eight hundredth
you write only one:
remove stolen, otherwise I will return to court .
How! - Meet you - "But I put the link!
Ladies and gentlemen, the copyright - it is not right to link and not the letter With the brackets.
This right to copy.
copied, you know?
law says quote anything that contains less than 60% of the text, and after the quote - yes, must go to a link to the original.
Only then will your publication be considered quote.
And if you've copied the whole text, then set you are after a link or not set, and the text that you stole.
And even if you yourself from it is not got nothing, then the author has spent on creating the text day or night work, worked in vain, though not promised you to do so for reasons of charity.
More emphasize again: this is not addressed to him to whom care is consuming he is in another person a piece of bread or not.
It is addressed to those who think stealing another's work shameful deed.