Huggies Store Display

What is the set of active protection of mines ICBM? Index

Overview:
"... On his initiative (SP Invincible) in MSC was created fundamentally new direction in the field of armament - complexes are active protection of armored vehicles and other equipment. It is now widely known acquired such a complex "Arena". But few know that the same principle created a complex active protection of silo launchers of intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs). For the first time the world realized intercept low-altitude ballistic purposes of non-nuclear means.
initially to deal with massive attack warheads flying, surrounded by masses of decoys used by anti-aircraft missiles with nuclear warheads. Atmospheric nuclear explosions should destroy other people's warheads on approach, while the radioactive cloud over their own territory - Also no joy.
But the ring around antiraket only Moscow. Mine ICBMs were virtually defenseless against the high-precision warheads potential opponent. Under the leadership of Sergei Invincible has created an active armor for silos, is also not inconsistent with the ABM Treaty. Falling warhead encounters a cloud of small steel projectiles. They converge at a speed of 6 km / sec, and carries a warhead to pieces. Cheaply and efficiently.
All ingenious is simple and gracefully. Block of several hundred barrels. Inside each - a charge of gunpowder and steel shot. Synchronized volley of shells did not throw a jet, not a wall, as volumetric clouds certain density, which can not be overcome. In fact, medieval kartechnitsa, but high-tech, equipped with electronic system of target detection, guidance and volley. In the late 1980's in the Kamchatka site "Kura" active armor ICBM silo was first intercepted on the approach weight and size mock warhead launched from Plesetsk region. ""

Wisdom Teeth Removal Hard Swelling

practical Russophobia

Theoretically, in the Baltic Russophobia not - there are very fond of "foreigners", especially Russian. To learn how to love them, will tell you of any Baltic officials and politicians. You'll learn about how good life Russian-speaking national Minorities under the shadow of the Baltic democracies. As the State protects their rights according to EU standards. You otraportuyut the enormous tools being developed each year by various foundations and non-profit "organizations for the purpose of enlightenment Russian to civilized state, in which they invariably become patriots of the Baltic states. If you are an official of the European Union, you will further talk about the efforts the fact that the "release our Russian" from the clutches of the Russian propaganda.

Only in a small Estonian Russian every day like Office Minister Population of the Integration Foundation, the Language Inspectorate, a department of the Ministry of Education to transfer Russian schools into Estonian learning. And then there is an ongoing forum, "Civil Peace" at City Hall in Tallinn, the Council of National Minorities to the Minister for Culture Roundtable National Minorities under the president of Estonia. Russian in Estonia like all the state - it is even documented captures their love in public integration program.

Naturally, in such a situation to talk about the presence of any Russophobia in Estonia, as well as in Latvia and Lithuania, just indecent. Moreover, the statements provided in the EU supervisory authorities, in order. However, as he tried to persuade officials of the Baltic весь мир в любви к русским, общественные организации и пресловутая российская пропагандистская машина постоянно обвиняет их в том, чего по бумагам can not be - in the very Russophobia.

Last year's April events in Estonia have clearly demonstrated that the statements and assurances of gracious coexistence of different linguistic communities in the Baltic countries is not entirely untrue. The growth of national tension in the country has forced the nation's elite to do some unpleasant task - finding the prerequisites of the conflict over the Bronze Soldier and the reasons for crisis was so deep and protracted.

The first findings were sobering: a group of sociologists, in many ways already interpreting the available data, converged in the fact that in the Estonian society, there is, to say the disparity between national and linguistic communities. However, if the general tone of the conclusions was done in the style of theoretical love for Russian. Mol, Russian in Estonia not sufficiently integrated into society, they do not know too well the language and because it is not enough educated and successful. As a result, we developed a new integration program, which stipulated that the word "inorodets" does not carry negative connotations, and Russian residents of Estonia's response has become much more actively apply for Russian citizenship.

That theory diverges from practice, and in Estonia there is Russophobia, certificates and other monumental document, which appeared in early April. In Estonia, with great fanfare published the human development index of the country, "one of the major sensations of which was the position in a society of "foreigners". Included in the report the report "as part of the Non-Estonians in Estonian society has demonstrated that foreign-language Estonian population is exposed strong discrimination in almost all vital sectors. According to the report, the Estonians have higher wages than non-Estonians, and despite economic growth, this difference continues to widen. For example, in 2004 the income of non-Estonians aged 15-30 years accounted for each household income 75% of Estonians in the same age group in 2006, this figure fell to 70%. The difference in assessment work does not disappear even when moving from traditionally depressed Russian regions in the prosperous part of Estonia.

Estonians living in North Estonia, earns 34% more than the Estonians in other regions of Estonia, while 30% more than living with him in a Russian region. Russian, who moved to North Estonia from another region of the country would earn only 14% more than it receives, while living in another part of Estonia. It is noteworthy that the difference in income with representatives of the indigenous population becomes more significant than higher qualifications and education is "inorodets. Among Estonians and with a low educational level of the difference in income is minimal, non-indigenous residents with higher education earn 25% less than the Estonians with the same education.

on quality of life of Russian people in a democratic Estonia does not affect not only the skills and education. Doing so-called integration requirements, which, according to the program is for Russian guarantee of success, do not reduce the level of discrimination. The study found that even young people who are fluent in Estonian, educated in Estonia and have Estonian citizenship, but the Estonians in origin, have difficulties in employment in public institutions. "Nationality does not guarantee true equality in the Estonian society ... Belonging to an ethnic minority has a negative impact the ability of a person to get a job supervisor or senior specialist in the public sector ", - admitted the editor devoted to non-Estonians Section of the report, Professor Marju Lauristin.

However, she believes this situation proves the maturity of Estonian democracy and prosperity Estonian state. According Lauristin, statistics indicate that as the growth of social welfare in Estonia appear problems typical for affluent societies. One of them - the so-called problem of the "glass ceiling". "With its experienced, Sweden, Germany, England, to a lesser extent Finland - all the old democracies, where under very different conditions, there is a situation where, starting with a certain level, minorities difficult to move on "- she said.

statistics, however, is stubborn and undeniable. Discrimination in Estonia is. Democracy implies equality empowerment. An important aspect of the implementation of the add is not only the declaration but also to allow the individual to use them. In the same case, if for any reason a person or a community linked by any ground, can not implement the declared rights and opportunities, there is inequality, or rather - discrimination. And if the fact of deliberate non-fixed group of individuals to implement basic right - the right to life, then fit to speak of genocide. Genocide, based on the ethnic principle, called ethnocide.

Strictly speaking about the unequal situation of linguistic communities in Estonia was known previously. But first, all data were compiled into one document. Due to this Even representatives of the national elite had to accept that the basis of discrimination are not "objective" reasons for less than Russian Estonians are competitive, and a simple practical Russophobia in Estonia has become everyday reality, and one of the pillars of political and business systems of the country.

in Russia now and in the past, much has been said about the European Russophobia. But, by and large, for Russians these problems located in the plane of national pride and geopolitics. No accident that among the Russian establishment is extremely popular patriotic poem Pushkin's Slanderers Russia. But the strategy of ignoring European Russophobia proposed by Pushkin, is fatal to Russian communities in the Baltic states. In the truest sense of the word - according to a report on human development in Estonia, the average life expectancy of Estonians to exceed 6 years average life expectancy of the local Russian. And there is every reason to believe that this dark gap is the result of Russo-phobia, prosperous in the Baltics.

Dmitry Kondrashov

http://www.rosbalt.ru/2008/04/23/477202.html

Gay Cruising Spots, Pa

Totalitarian Quitters

Since 1933, the international value of the Kremlin was quick to rise. Do not just have to hear from European journalists about such judgments: "The Kremlin holds in its hands the fate of Europe", "Stalin has become an international arbitrator, and so on. No matter how This estimate was exaggerated in those days, but it came out two undeniable factors: worsening global antagonisms and-increasing power of the Red Army. Relative the success of the first five years, the consequent optimistic estimate of the second Five-Year Plan, tactile for all successes of industrialization, created for the Army and the Navy industrial base, overcoming the progressive paralysis of the railway, the first favorable yields on the basis of collective farms, the growth of cattle, mitigating hunger and poverty - these were the internal prerequisites success of Soviet diplomacy. To this period belong the words of Stalin: "life has become easier life has become merrier. "toiling masses to live to truly become a little easier. Bureaucracies life has become much more fun. A large share of national income meanwhile, went on the defensive. Peacetime strength of 800,000 was reduced to a half million. Revived fleet. During the years of Soviet regime managed to emerge a new command structure, from lieutenants and to the marshals. To this we must add the political factor: the opposition, left as right, was defeated. Victory over the opposition as it found its objectively justified by the economic success. Stalin's power seemed unshakable. Taken together, transformed the Soviet government, if not in Europe, the arbitrator, then at least in a major international factor.

the past two years have left from this situation, a stone. Share of Soviet diplomacy is now lower than at the most critical months of the first five years. London not only turned to Rome and Berlin, but also requires Paris so that he turned his back to Moscow. Its policy of isolating the USSR, Hitler has, thus, the ability to carry current through the Chamberlain. If France does not renounce the treaty with the Soviet Union, she brought him to the role of secondary reserves. Having lost faith in Moscow's support, third republic relentlessly follows on the heels of England. Conservative French patriots, not without bitterness, complaining that France was "the last Dominion of Great Britain. Italy and Germany, with the consent of that Chamberlain going to firmly establish itself in Spain, where quite recently, Stalin seemed to be - and not just myself - Arbiter.

look for the cause of the catastrophic decline of the international role of boards in the past two years to reconcile or mitigate international conflicts could not necessary; whatever episodic and kon'yunkturnye fluctuations imperialist countries are fatal to a world war. The conclusion is clear: the bankruptcy of Stalin on the world scene is primarily the result of internal development of the USSR. What actually happened in the Soviet Union during the past two years, which made the power of powerlessness? Economy keeps growing like, the industry despite the so-called "sabotage", he continues to boast successes, the harvest increases, the military reserves are accumulated, Stalin successfully cope with internal enemies. What's the matter?

Not so long ago, the world judged the Soviet Union almost exclusively on the numbers of Soviet statistics. These figures, albeit with a tendentious exaggeration, nevertheless testified to the undoubted success. It was assumed that the paper curtain-increasing numbers hides the welfare of the people and government. It turned out all wrong. Processes of the economy, politics and culture are in the final analysis, the relationship between human beings, groups, classes. The Moscow trials of the tragedy found that the relationship of badly, or rather, are intolerable.

Army is the quintessence of the regime, not in the sense that it expresses only the "best" of its quality, and that the positive as well as negative trends in society, it gives the most concentrated expression. When the contradictions and antagonisms of the regime reaches a certain acuity, they begin to undermine the army from within. Opposite conclusion: if the army is the most disciplined body of the ruling class, begins to tear internal contradictions, it is an unmistakable sign of unbearable crisis in the society.

economic successes of the Soviet Union, strengthened the at a certain moment of his army and his diplomacy, the most raised and strengthened the ruling bureaucratic layer. No class and never in history did not concentrate in their hands in such a short period of such wealth and power, which focused bureaucracy for years, two five-year plans. But it was, she placed herself in-increasing conflict with people who passed through three revolutions and overthrew the tsarist monarchy, aristocracy and bourgeoisie. The Soviet bureaucracy focuses в себе ныне, в известном смысле, черты всех этих низвергнутых классов, не имея ни их социальных корней, ни их традиций. Она может отстаивать свои чудовищные privileges only to organized terror, how can it justify their terror only false accusations and fraud. Having grown out of our economic achievements, autocracy of the bureaucracy was the main obstacle to these successes in the future. Growth of the country is unthinkable without further overall growth of the culture, that is, without independence each and all, without free criticism and free inquiry. These basic conditions of progress required the Army to an even greater extent than the economy, because in the army or the fictional reality of statistical data is checked by blood. Meanwhile, the political regime of a socialist country finally approached to the regime of a penal battalion. All advanced and creative elements that are truly committed to the interests of economy, public education or folk Defense has always come into conflict with the ruling oligarchy. So it was at one time under the tsars, is happening, but much more rapidly now under the regime of Stalin. Economy, culture, and the army needed proponents, builders, creators. Kremlin needs loyal performers, reliable and ruthless agents. These human types - the agent and the creator - are implacably hostile to each other.

During the past 12 months, the Red Army lost almost all his command staff, who were recruited initially during the Civil War (1918-20), then trained, skilled, replenished over the next 15 years. Radically updated and continually updated the officer corps, the bureaucracy has put under strict supervision by the new commissioners. Tukhachevsky with him color commanders were killed in the struggle against dictatorship over the police officers of the Red Army. For their social as military bureaucracy, Of course, no better than civil. But the conflict and do not pass completely on this watershed. Bureaucracy, taken as a whole, concentrating in its hands two functions: power and administration. These two functions, and now came into sharp conflict. To ensure good administration, must be eliminated totalitarian power. To save power, you need to smash the self-reliant and capable administrators.

Institute commissioners introduced for the first time in During construction of the Red Army out of nothing, means, necessary, double-mode command. Inconvenience and danger of such an order had been completely obvious and then, but they were seen as less and moreover the temporary evil. Most need dvoenachaliya in the Army grew from the collapse of the tsarist army and the conditions of civil war. What does the new dvoenachalie: the first stage of the collapse of the Red Army and the beginning of a new civil war in the country?

Commissioners first call means control of the working class over the alien and hostile to the experts. Commissioners of the new formation meant control of the Bonapartist Clicks on the military and the civilian administration, and through it over the people. Commissioners of the first period were recruited from the serious and honest revolutionaries, indeed devoted to the cause of socialism. Commanders that went largely from the ranks of the old officers or noncommissioned officers, as poorly versed in the new environment and, in the person of its best representatives, to search for advice and support to commissioners. Not without tensions and conflicts, dvoenachalie resulted in a time of friendly cooperation.

situation is quite different now. Today's commanders have grown out of the Red Army, is inextricably linked with it, and have won credibility for years. On the contrary, Commissioners are recruited from the bureaucratic sons, who have no revolutionary experience, no military knowledge or moral capital. This is a pure type of careerists the new school. They are intended to command only because they embody the "vigilance", ie, police supervision over the army. Commanders treat them with a well-deserved hatred. Dvoenachaliya mode turns into a struggle of the political police with the army, and on the side of the police is the central authority.

History the film unfolds in reverse order, and that was a measure of progressive revolution reborn as a hideous and Thermidorean cartoons. New dvoenachalie passes through the state apparatus from top to bottom. At the head of the army is nominally Voroshilov, People's Commissar Marshal, Knight Orders and so on and so forth. But the actual power is concentrated in the hands of the Mehlis, who, on direct instructions of Stalin's army turns upside down. The same thing happens in every military district, in every division in every regiment. Everywhere sits his Mehlis, the agent of Stalin and Ezhov, and implanting "vigilance", rather than knowledge order and discipline. All relations in the Army were shaky, wobbly, floating in nature. Nobody knows where it ends patriotism, which starts cheating. No not sure if that is possible, what is not. In case of conflict in orders commander and commissar, each is forced to guess which of two paths leading to the award, What - to prison. All the waiting and anxious look around the sides. Do honest workers give up. Rogues, thieves and careerists arrange their affairs under the guise of patriotic denunciations. Shaken the foundations of the army. In large and small is becoming a derelict. Weapons are not cleaned and checked. Barracks, take dirty and non-residential appearance. Leaking roofs, missing baths, laundry in the Red Army. Food is getting worse in quality and not served in the put hours. In response complaints commander refers to the commissioner, the commissioner accuses the commander. Real culprits hide behind the denunciations by pests. Among the commanders increased drunkenness; commissioners compete with them and in this regard. Covered police despotism of the regime of anarchy undermines all now part of the Soviet life, but especially death he in the army, which can live only with proper treatment and full transparency of all relationships.

diagnosis is clear. Growth of the country and especially the growth of its new needs is incompatible with a totalitarian abomination and therefore tends to displace, extrude, bulge bureaucracy from all areas. This process has not yet found an open political expression, but the more he is deep and inevitable. In the field of technology, economy, science, culture, Defence people experience, knowledge, authority, automatically displace ago agents of Stalin's dictatorship, most of them ignorant and cynical scoundrels, type of Mehlis and Yezhov. When Stalin accused one or another part of the apparatus in the loss of "vigilance", he says this: you take care of the interests of economy, science or army, but you do not care about my interests! In this same position each of Stalin's agents in all areas of the country and at all tiers of bureaucratic tower. Bureaucracy can keep on their power not only as undermining the basis of all economic and cultural progress. So, on a new historical based unexpectedly revived the age-old antagonism between the Russian and oprichinoy Zemshchina. The struggle between them became the extermination of the best people in the country its most depraved garbage.

Defeatism, sabotage and treason in the nesting oprichine Stalin. Ober-defeatist is the "father of nations," it is their executioner. Ensure that national defense can not be otherwise than defeating the autocratic clique saboteurs and defeatists. The slogan of Soviet patriotism is: Down with the totalitarian the defeatists! out of Stalin and his oprichinu!

The Best Goto Refractor

Soviet-Estonian treaty in 1920

pact can be assessed from different points of view.
In principle - that they wanted the Bolsheviks - the Russian conditional and unconditional Estonian? They wanted development to the same scenario, which carried out Stalin in 20 years.

- based on the declared "right of nations to self-determination", the Estonian Bolsheviks declared the independence of the Estonian Socialist Republic. Which vsilu its socialist orientation, enters into an alliance with other Soc. republics to form the new - socialist state within the borders of crown lands of the Russian Empire, but with Reset internal boundaries, according to the principle of national self-determination.

In general, this is all that mutili Bolsheviks in part gos.ustroystva.

similar situation has been and with Finland. only it was meant friendly, but outside the state. Since the preservation of the Grand Duchy of Finland under the hand of the Red or White King not postulated to nation-building.
At the end of the Great War - Nikolai Alexandrovich felt first need to get rid of from V.Kn.Finlyandskogo and V.Kn.Polskogo. The Bolsheviks also were not interested in Finland, apart from the establishment there of the union of the regime.

in Estonia were group-oriented an alliance with the West and the alliance with the East.
Second - this is the Estonian Estonian Bolsheviks and the Whites (probably mainly from the Germans, the Estonian identity navryadli national elite could comprehend such a complex union).
first - is in the best position. Because they had a choice - the Germans and the Entente, nor interested in creating a pro-Western regime.
As a result - they have the support of both. Entente left by German troops in the Baltics, while supporting pro-Western modes of military force.

What is the difference between the first and second? The fact that the latter operate within the Russian Empire, pereplaniruya internal borders, or claiming within it the principles of social, self-determination, etc. That is - all of them eventually returned to re-create the saved state with the modified criteria.

The first - certainly acted against the interests of the Russian state in all its guises. As an agent of the annexation of the National territory. Agents of external forces, carrying out the task of the deposition of the strategically important territories under the control of foreign countries. This function has no nothing to do with the "right of nations to self-determination."

good for the Estonians that they became an ally of external anti-Russian forces? None. For them it is very bad. Not having an unconditional right to a territory not having enough people, the Estonians themselves can not administer the territory. They become an object control from outside. That is - to lose a national subjectivity.
Given inherent in their independence facto annexation of the Territory's laws of the Russian Empire by their existence is the full protection of illegal alien regained possession, and the confrontation with the legitimate owner.
Naturally, the confrontation with Russia and Russian - is in itself a sentence that is not appealable. But even without this fact, such a model national structure - deprives nation of any prospects for development, including the mechanism of negative selection.
So - Estonians actually signed a verdict as constituted nation. The question of its enforcement - is still open. But the process of putting - is already running. Of course, their own hands